Project

General

Profile

Bug #103

court system design is basically broken

Added by Woozle Hypertwin about 1 year ago. Updated 12 months ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Start date:
05/14/2018
Due date:
% Done:

0%


Description

  1. The degree to which it functions at all depends heavily on how much money a participant is able to spend. (see issue about money being OP stat)
  2. Even when participants are on equal footing financially, decisions do not appear to be based on any kind of rational appraisal of the evidence.
  3. Too much in-person participation required; should be asynchronous and offsite unless there is compelling reason to do it in person or synchronously.
This is both an example of and caused by issue #109:
  • example of: The courtroom decisionmaking process, while documented at great length, is broken as described above.
    • The documentation is also terrible.
  • caused by: If we had better political decisionmaking processes, we could begin to fix the problems with the court system through legislation.

Related issues

Related to Bug #109: the processes for making important decisions are broken/corrupt New 05/16/2018

History

#1 Updated by Woozle Hypertwin about 1 year ago

  • Subject changed from Court system design is basically broken to court system design is basically broken

#2 Updated by Woozle Hypertwin 12 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Assignee set to Woozle Hypertwin

#3 Updated by Woozle Hypertwin 12 months ago

  • Related to Bug #109: the processes for making important decisions are broken/corrupt added

Also available in: Atom PDF